Netflix’s Inventing Anna: What’s fact and what’s fiction?

Inventing Anna arrived final month and gave us loads of true crime materials to pour over – however the place precisely does truth cease and fiction begin?

The brand new Netflix sequence – which stars Ozark actor Julia Garner as scammer Anna Delvey (actual identify Anna Sorokin) – is without doubt one of the streamer’s most anticipated releases so far.

Inventing Anna tells the unbelievable true story of Sorokin, a twenty-something socialite who efficiently posed as a wealthy German heiress below the identify Anna Delvey in New York Metropolis.

She efficiently conned mates and large banks out of tons of of 1000’s of {dollars} earlier than she was convicted of fraud and grand larceny.

At her trial in 2019, Sorokin was discovered responsible of swindling greater than $200,000 (£147,000) from accommodations, banks and different establishments. She scammed additional sums of cash from associates and mates whom she met below false pretences.

Inventing Anna explores Sorokin’s rise and fall via the angle of Jessica Pressler, the journalist who penned an explosive exposé on Sorokin that went viral in 2018.

As each episode reiterates, “This whole story is completely true. Except for the parts that are completely made up,” so we’ve rounded up a number of the present’s greatest storylines and in contrast truth to fiction…

Vivian Kent


My Lady star Anna Chlumsky performs Vivian Kent, a journalist who endeavours to inform Sorokin’s (Julia Garner) story.

Vivian’s character is a stand-in for real-life journalist Jessica Pressler who wrote the exposé for New York Journal’s The Minimize (retitled Manhattan Journal in Inventing Anna). Like Vivian, Pressler interviewed Sorokin whereas she was awaiting trial in jail at Rikers Island. She additionally spoke with a lot of Sorokin’s friends to uncover the true story behind the faux heiress.

Entry limitless streaming of flicks and TV exhibits with Amazon Prime Video Enroll now for a 30-day free trial


As is depicted within the sequence, Pressler was pregnant via a lot of the writing of the story and wrote the exposé partly as a result of she needed to redeem herself after an earlier mistake threatened to finish her profession. In 2014, Bloomberg Information rescinded a job provide to Pressler after a bit that she had written proved to be a hoax. That is referred to all through the sequence.

In a current interview with Vulture, Pressler revealed that Netflix and Shondaland – Shonda Rhimes’s manufacturing firm – contacted her about adapting her article “about a month” after it was revealed.

Pressler stated that she was not all the time on board with Inventing Anna that includes a personality based mostly on herself. “It was not a thing I wanted, but I understand the impulse of why they wanted to do it,” she stated, including that Vivian’s character capabilities as “a tour guide into this world”. Pressler has beforehand been flippantly fictionalised on display. Julia Stiles performed a model of her within the 2019 movie Hustlers, which was based mostly on one other of Pressler’s articles.

Vivian’s editors


Throughout the sequence, Vivian faces an uphill battle along with her two editors who aren’t satisfied that Anna Delvey is price a narrative. When Vivian initially brings them the concept in episode one, they’re hesitant. They need her to pursue an article concerning the Me Too motion in Wall Avenue as a substitute. Requested whether or not this was true of her editors in real-life, Pressler stated that her bosses at New York Journal “are quite the opposite”.

“I think the show bosses are a stand-in for patriarchal offices in general,” Pressler advised Vulture. She did, nonetheless, concede that it was “not a no-brainer to do an 8,000-word story about a non-famous person” and that her editors in real-life had needed her to jot down a bit about Me Too in Wall Avenue – one thing that she didn’t wish to do.

Anna’s relationship with Chase


Loads of display time is afforded to Anna’s turbulent relationship along with her boyfriend Chase Sikorski (Saamer Usmani). Like Anna, Chase is a hustler. He’s a tech bro seeking to supply seed cash for his app known as Wake – which is vaguely described as an app used to seize information round goals. The complete idea, nonetheless, isn’t absolutely defined. He’s additionally portrayed as Anna’s cash-cow within the sequence, forming a part of the reason as to how she was capable of fund her lavish life-style.

Whereas Chase performs an enormous position in Anna’s life, there may be solely a short point out of such a boyfriend within the New York Journal article. Pressler writes of a “boyfriend [Sorokin] was running around with for a while”. The journalist calls him a “futurist on the TED-Talks circuit who’d been profiled in The New Yorker”. Likewise in Inventing Anna, when Vivian lastly manages to pay money for Chase, he solely agrees to talk along with her if she refers to him within the article as “the futurist”.

Pressler writes that for about two years Sorokin and “the futurist” had operated as “a team, showing up in places frequented by the itinerant wealthy”. Inventing Anna appears to have picked up on this element, framing Anna and Chase as a dynamic duo hustling their approach up the ladder by rubbing shoulders with the appropriate individuals. Inventing Anna sees Chase’s app fail and the character ultimately strikes to the UAE to work for a Sheikh; this storyline is mirrored within the real-life article, too.

The Anna Delvey Basis


Garner’s Anna places all her power into founding the Anna Delvey Basis, an uber unique arts membership in New York Metropolis. Within the present, Anna has one location in thoughts: the historic Church Missions Home. This was true in actuality, too. Sorokin needed to discovered ADF (although, she anxious the identify is perhaps “too narcissistic”) on the Church Missions Home, a landmarked six-floor constructing managed by actual property mogul Aby Rosen on the nook of Park Avenue and twenty second.

Within the sequence, when giving a tour of the property to her workforce on the challenge, Anna speaks about eager to have a rotating array of pop-up outlets in addition to exhibitions and installations from high-profile artists together with Urs Fischer and Tracey Emin. She additionally tells them that the artist Christo agreed to wrap the constructing. All the above are actual particulars lifted from the New York Journal piece.

Stealing a jet


In episode 4, Anna is invited to attend Warren Buffet’s annual funding convention in Omaha. Eager to arrive in type, she texts the CEO of a non-public jet firm known as Blade whom she briefly met at a celebration. She asks him to organise a aircraft for her and her mates. He vaguely responds by asking his workforce to “assist Ms Delvey”. She takes the aircraft regardless of not placing any cash down for it.

In actual life, Sorokin attended the Omaha funding and in line with the New York Journal article, she managed to “convince” an organization known as Blade to constitution her a $35,000 (£25,750) jet to Omaha, noting that she met the CEO of Blade in passing at a Soho Home. Though it isn’t proven within the sequence, Pressler’s article notes that Sorokin despatched the corporate a cast affirmation for a wire switch from Deutsche Financial institution that by no means arrived.

Alan Reed


Episode three focuses on Anna’s relationship with Alan Reed, a massively profitable finance lawyer whom she persuades to assist her safe loans for ADF. Within the sequence, they’re depicted as having an in depth relationship. Reed is seen to be massively supportive of Anna and her goals to construct ADF.

In actual life, Sorokin labored with Andy Lance, a associate at big-time agency Gibson Dunn. Sorokin advised Pressler that in contrast to different attorneys, Lance would “explain to me the right amount, without being patronising”. She additionally described their working relationship as shut, including that he was “there [for her] all the time” even when he was on holidays. Simply as within the sequence, Alan checks containers confirming Anna has the sources to pay with out ever confirming the existence of such sources, Lance did the identical in actual life. Lance didn’t reply to Pressler’s request for remark on the time.

Peter Henneke


Within the sequence, Anna tells Alan to contact the top of her household workplace in Germany, Peter Hennecke, to substantiate the main points of her belief fund. It’s later revealed that Hennecke doesn’t exist and the telephone calls Alan had with Hennecke had been, in reality, with Anna herself. Inventing Anna reveals that Anna had been utilizing a burner telephone with a European SIM to faux the calls; she had additionally purchased a voice disguising software program in order that her voice would sound like a German man’s.

In actual life, Sorokin did give Alan the main points of 1 Peter Hennecke. When emails to Hennecke despatched from individuals to whom Anna owed cash started bouncing again, Sorokin knowledgeable them that Hennecke had died. Pressler, nonetheless, notes that he “seems to have been a fictional character” with the cell-phone quantity having belonged to Hennecke tracing again to a now-defunct burner telephone.

Todd Spodek


Succession star Arian Moayed performs Todd Spodek, Anna’s underdog lawyer. The character is, in reality, based mostly on Sorokin’s actual lawyer. Whereas different characters have had their names modified (eg Vivian Kent and Alan Reed) Spodek is the lawyer’s actual identify.

In 2019, Spodek represented Sorokin at her trial. As is depicted within the sequence, he argued that his shopper was by no means near securing a mortgage of greater than $1m (£737,000) from personal fairness companies together with Fortress Funding Group.

Vacation from hell in Morocco


Episode six is a spotlight of the season, telling the story of Anna’s ill-fated vacation in Marrakech along with her private coach, a videographer and the Self-importance Truthful journalist Rachel.

This episode takes a lot of its materials not solely from the New York Journal article, but in addition a first-person function written by Williams for Self-importance Truthful – the place she had labored as a photojournalist –  in April 2018. After befriending her at a celebration in 2016, Sorokin invited Williams on an opulent vacation to Marrakech the place they – and Sorokin’s coach and a photographer – stayed on the five-star luxurious resort La Mamounia.

Williams was pressured into footing the invoice for the entire vacation when Sorokin stated she was experiencing hassle along with her financial institution – however assured Williams that she could be absolutely reimbursed. The journalist put the aircraft tickets on her American Categorical card; Sorokin additionally requested her to pay a few designer Kaftans and an extravagant dinner on the prestigious La Sultana restaurant. When Sorokin’s card was declined for the large lodge sum, Williams was pressured into placing her bank card on file. The lodge assured her that no cost could be made and that they solely wanted a functioning card on file. Later, nonetheless, when Sorokin couldn’t materialise a working bank card of her personal, the lodge ended up charging the $62,000 sum to Williams. She solely ever acquired $5,000 from Sorokin.

As is depicted within the sequence, the coach in actual life grew to become in poor health and flew dwelling from Marrakech earlier than the others. When the cash points began coming to a head on the journey, nonetheless, Sorokin known as the coach and requested her to e book a flight dwelling for her. In line with the coach (who stays unnamed within the Self-importance Truthful article), Sorokin requested her to e book a first-class ticket. That is mirrored within the sequence, though it’s flippantly fictionalised with Anna telling Kacey (performed by Laverne Cox) that she was mugged in an effort to elucidate the rationale why she wants her to e book her flight dwelling. There was no point out of a mugging in both of the articles.

Vivian’s journey to Germany


In the direction of the top of the sequence, after Vivian’s profile has been revealed, she goes to Germany on a mission to search out Anna’s mother and father. The present depicts Vivian breaking into Anna’s household dwelling in an effort to learn how she grew to become the scammer she is.

When talking to locals within the city the place Anna grew up, Vivian hears rumours that Anna’s father is a Russian mobster. She additionally receives conflicting tales about what Anna was like in class; a instructor says that she was a shy scholar, whereas her friends make her out to be a bully.

Pressler did go to Germany to search out out extra about Anna. She clarifies, nonetheless, that she “definitely did not try to break into anyone’s home”. The journalist advised Vulture that she had a lot materials about Anna and stored listening to “so many different stories” and “conspiracy theories” that she thought she would possibly write a e book. As is mirrored within the sequence, Pressler ultimately decides to drop the concept.

Anna’s trial wardrobe


The ultimate episode of the sequence dramatises Sorokin’s trial, which started in March 2019 and was presided over by Choose Diane Kiesel. Inventing Anna sees Vivian exit and purchase Anna personal garments for the trial after Anna refuses to put on the court-provided apparel – an ordeal that causes main delays.

This was partly true of real-life. Pressler advised Vulture that there had been “hiccups with the clothing deliveries”, which meant that the designer garments Sorokin needed to put on hadn’t arrived and that held up the trial. Usually, the courtroom would have garments to lend the defendant however Pressler notes that they didn’t have any on that particular day, which means that Sorokin had no garments to put on and so proceedings had been delayed.

Pressler added that it wasn’t solely due to Sorokin’s self-importance that the trial was delayed, stating: “Defendants have to wear civilian clothes at trial because if they wear a prison jumpsuit it might prejudice the jury.”

Pressler was then requested to go to H&M to purchase an outfit for Sorokin, which she did. The journalist bought each the white costume and snake-print costume that Sorokin was famously photographed in. She additionally lent Sorokin certainly one of her personal clothes (the black one), including that she “did not feel like it was a conflict at all”. Pressler stated it felt like “this will be a funny story someday”.

Rachel’s testimony on the trial


After serving to the FBI organise a sting operation to arrest Anna in Los Angeles, Rachel testifies in opposition to her former pal on the trial. Each of this stuff are true. On 3 October 2017, Sorokin was arrested by the LA police division in a sting operation deliberate by the Manhattan District Lawyer’s workplace with Williams’s assist.

Williams later took to the stand to testify in opposition to Sorokin within the 2019 trial. She tearfully recalled the “trauma” of their journey to Morocco. Snippets of dialogue featured in Inventing Anna are ripped from the real-life cross-examination of Williams by Sorokin’s lawyer, Todd Spodek.

As per Rolling Stone’s reporting on the trial, throughout cross-examination, Spodek tried to painting Williams as an opportunist who tried to take advantage of her relationship with Delvey for cash. He spoke about how Williams profited financially from her friendship with Sorokin and its fallout. Williams secured a $300,000 (£221,318) e book take care of Simon & Schuster, and acquired $35,000 (£25,820) from HBO for the rights to her story, an quantity that would improve to an approximate $300,000 (£221,318). She was additionally paid $1,300 (£960) by Self-importance Truthful for the unique article. It was later revealed that American Categorical additionally waived the $62,000 (£45,740) price of fees that had been incurred on Williams’s bank cards because of the Morocco journey.

Williams refuted this characterisation of herself as an opportunist. On the trial, she advised the choose and jury: “I didn’t want the trial or my testimony to be misconstrued as a ploy for my own benefit, because it is not.

“This is not about entertainment. It is about law and order and a crime…this is about a trauma. This is about something I went through.” Followers will recall this actual speech from Rachel’s scene within the last episode of Inventing Anna.

Inventing Anna is accessible to stream on Netflix

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.